首页> 外文OA文献 >The effect of hand held calculators on learning about: functions, functional notation, graphing, function composition, and inverse functions
【2h】

The effect of hand held calculators on learning about: functions, functional notation, graphing, function composition, and inverse functions

机译:手持计算器对以下方面的影响:函数,函数符号,图形,函数组成和反函数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if a unit about functions in a Basic Collegiate Mathematics class where use of calculators was integrated into the instruction was more effective than a unit about functions where use of calculators was allowed but not integrated into the instruction;The investigator with the assistance of the Department of Mathematics at the University of Northern Iowa (UNI) developed a unit on functions and a thirty-item achievement test (two forms). The total test was to measure unit achievement. Five non-intersecting subsets of five or six items each were to measure achievement in: (1) The idea of a function sub-unit, (2) Functional notation sub-unit, (3) Graphing sub-unit, (4) Composition of functions sub-unit and (5) Inverse functions sub-unit;One form of the test was administered as a pretest. Eleven days of instruction took place. The second form was administered as a posttest. There were 164 Basic Collegiate Mathematics students from UNI at Cedar Falls, Iowa involved in the study. Enrollment procedures did not allow random assignment of students. Class 1 (76 students) and class 3 (50 students) were randomly assigned to be experimental groups. Everyday, in these classes, the calculator was used in demonstrations and/or discussions as an aid to learning about functions. Class 2 (38 students) was the control group. In this class, although calculator use was allowed, instruction did not require nor encourage calculator use and no in-class calculator demonstrations occurred;The pretest scores were used as convariates in an analysis of covariance. No significant differences were found between groups in student achievement in the functions unit. No significant differences were found between goups in any of the five sub-units;The findings led to the following conclusions: (1) The integration of the calculator into a unit on functions did not cause more effective learning about functions. (2) The integration of the calculator into a unit on functions did not cause more effective learning in any of the five sub-units.
机译:这项调查的目的是确定在基础大学数学课程中将计算器的使用功能集成到指令中的功能单元是否比在允许使用计算器但不将其集成到指令中的功能单元更有效;研究人员在北爱荷华大学(UNI)的数学系的协助下,开发了一个功能单元和一项三十项成就测试(两种形式)。总体测试是衡量单位成绩。五个不相交的子集,每个子​​集包含五个或六个项目,这些子集在以下方面衡量成就:(1)功能子单元的概念;(2)功能符号子单元;(3)图形子单元;(4)组成功能子单元和(5)逆函数子单元;以一种形式的测试作为预测试。进行了为期11天的教学。第二种形式是作为后期测试使用的。爱荷华州锡达福尔斯的UNI共有164名基础大学数学学生参加了这项研究。入学程序不允许学生随机分配。将第1级(76名学生)和第3级(50名学生)随机分配为实验组。每天,在这些课程中,计算器都会用于演示和/或讨论中,以帮助学习功能。第2班(38名学生)为对照组。在本课程中,尽管允许使用计算器,但教学既不需要也不鼓励使用计算器,并且没有发生课堂上的计算器演示;预测试成绩被用作协方差分析中的变量。职能部门的学生成绩在各组之间没有发现显着差异。在五个子单元中的任何一个中,在组之间都没有发现显着差异;这些发现得出以下结论:(1)将计算器集成到功能单元中并没有导致对功能的更有效的学习。 (2)将计算器集成到功能单元中,并没有在五个子单元中的任何一个中带来更有效的学习。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rule, Robert Loren;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1980
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号